Jolicloud - may just become the best Linux for your netbook?

I've been waiting to write this for about 6 months, since I first heard of Jolicloud, a revolutionary new linux based OS for netbooks.

The fact that Jolicloud is based on Ubuntu stands it in good stead already. But Joliclouds developers have invested a significant ammount of effort in changing the way the the OS approaches applications and - the clue is in the name - takes a more cloud computing friendly approach to their deployment.

Installing the alpha was completed in about 25 minutes from a 2GB USB stick and was a very simple process. Clear instructions were provided on the site for both creating the USB and running the installation. The installation is also familiar - it's the same as the standard Ubuntu installer and making the same choices delivers an installation.

So what's the difference? Well, Jolicloud is designed to take a much more web-based / cloud computing approach to delivering applications and services to your netbook. After the install has completed, you have only a relatively basic set of applications in place, and, on first inspection no obvious way to add them (Synaptic doesn't appear in the application menu as it normally would) ... then you follow the instructions and log into the Jolicloud and it all starts to make sense.

This is where the key difference between Jolicloud and other Linux distributions shows up. Synaptic is now replaced by a much more visual and interactive menu that includes updates, application installation as well as including notifications, profile management and (in the future) community elements. It's this that helps to make Jolicloud such an interesting package.

Where have I go to now? Well. I have the usual Firefox / Mozilla / OpenOffice combination installed. In addition, I have Wine and Winedoors (the latter had to be downloaded and installed manually), and running on that I have Flash 8, Dreamweaver 8 and Photoshop CS2. The only thing that I needed to install by hand with Synaptic was Rhythmn Box. A music player is available, but just wasn't what I wanted. I think the key point of this is that should you need to do something by hand, you can, and it doesn't break everything.

I've been running for over a week now, and it's all good. It's easy, even for an Alpha, I haven't yet found something that doesn't work. I like it, and by the time this has reached a final release I suspect Ubuntu 9.04 is going to face a serious challenge (if not and outright winner) in the netbook market.

Windows vs. Linux on netbooks ... some mixed results

Well, I've done a number of tests around this and I have to say that I get very mixed result and it seems for a number of reasons. So what I'm going to do here is explain case-by-case what happened.

Case 1 - Business users:
In one of the companies that I work for we trialled a pair of EeePC 901s running linux as a cheap, long battery-life portable solution for getting people to work on trains without needing to carry a laptop and it's assorted clutter around. This worked reasonably well, but the thing that stopped it being a success was that the Linux OS stopped the users (non-techy, account managers) from feeling comfortable with the EeePCs ... they didn't treat them as laptops, but more like mobile phones or PDAs - as though they were inherently less capable than an equivalent Windows based laptop. So we installed Windows XP on both and immediately found that the users opinions changed and we started having problems getting them back.

Case 2 - Domestic user:
My wife changed jobs recently and needed a computer to take with her so she could make use of the time she would be spending on the train. So I installed Windows 7 RC on my EeePC 900 as my wife had expressed some negative opinions about using Linux (and we've heard a lot about Windows 7 being less demanding than Vista) and the end result was essentially useable. Boot times looked good (45 seconds for a login prompt, +50 seconds to get to desktop and able to start an application) but the problems came with the time taken to get out of sleep mode (several minutes) or to shut down (over 5 minutes). The following evening I replaced Windows 7 with Ubuntu 9.04 and the EeePC 900 went from dead-weight to useful (and incidentally, my wife has been getting on just fine with Linux).

What do I make of this? People like netbooks because despite lower performance and smaller size they offer increased portability and a superior user experience to a 3G phone or MID. The OS is still a key component to this user experience and the simple familiarity of Windows can make up for the other issues and present a viable proposition .... except Ubuntu 9.04 has rasied the bar on this, with much improved performance vs. Windows and a much slicker user experience. The gap between the two propositions (Windows and Linux) is diminishing and I hope to see this close further with some of the up-coming Linux releases - Fedora 11 and Jolicloud being two that I'm particularly interested in.

Window 7 RC public release - a bit of a dilemma

Now I have a dilemma. Microsoft have done the obvious and are working to build as much interest around Windows 7 as possible. Putting the RC out to the public is an obvious way of doing this and retaining control over it's distrubution (rather than the host of torrents for the betas that we have seen).

This does however leave me having to make a decision:do I test Windows 7, just to see, when I have to confess I am absolutly happy with Ubuntu 9.04.

That statement would benefit from a little qualification. I've been running Ubunt 9.04 from the day that it was released (some 3 weeks ago) and it has been a very welcome relief from the near-misses of many other distributions. Ubuntu has raised the game for Linux significantly with this, to the point where I would prefer to use that rather than any of the MS Windows based machines I also use. The *only* thing I haven't tried yet is my 3G USB modem. I suspect that that will just be a case of installing the drivers, but I'll confirm that later.

So I feel that I should give Windows 7 a go, just to see what it's like and how it deals with the challenges presented by the hardware constraints of netbooks, but I have to say, I just don't feel the need ...

Designer inside as well as outside

For a couple of years, the laptop manufacturers have produced designer exteriors for their laptops and are now continuing this with the netbooks (see the HP Mini 1000 Vivienne Tam Edition). This make an already attractive item into something quite special and helps to differentiate it from the other devices on the market and provides a little exclusivity.

Google were quick to pick up on this with the designer banners available for iGoogle.

What I'm keen to see is the Linux desktop community - particularly those working on netbook remix projects - to be developing intefaces with input from designers from outside the Linux community. In my opinion there is an opportunity for some very attractive interface work to be done, leading to unique distributions with the added desireability of a designer netbook-optimised interface. If anyone is working on this kind of project and wants t drop me a line ...

Netbook + Windows XP = Still the most usable combination?

I hate to be writing this. As you may have spotted from the rest of my blog, I love Linux and I own an EeePC 900. OK. I've tried a number of distributions and I have come to a conclusion that I don't actually like: Install Windows XP. Because in the end, it is just easier, and you'll be more productive because more of the software that you want to use will work.

It is a sad state of affairs really. We all know that Windows XP isn't all that - let's face it, we're talkign about an OS that has some fundamental flaws. But what it offers, and what I really hope that the Linux community will soon provide is true ease of use.

For example, I have a 3G usb modem that I can use while travelling. The device has a memory stick built in that contains the drivers - for both Windows and Linux. The Windows drivers install first time and work, the Linux drivers won't install properly and don't provide any feedback on why.

I don't actually want to use Windows XP - it feels like a step backwards. It just happens to work better. I'm hoping that JoliCloud will provide a real alternative ... then theres Windows 7 ...

5 Linux distributions for EeePC

Over the past few months I have installed a number of different Linux distributions on my EeePC 900 and these are my top 5 (in no particular order)....

Mandriva 2009.1 - Mandriva specify that EeePC and netbook hardware support (WLAN, LAN, Audio) is supported from the base install. I've tested Mandriva and it worked very well and the hardware in my EeePC 900 was supported straight off.

OpenSuse 11.1 - A nice distro that has a good set of features and has EeePC hardware support if you add the right repositories and install the required components. Not as easy as Mandriva, but there is a good amount of support information for EeePC specifically maintained on their site.

Fedora 10 - An interesting distribution that I'm running at the moment. WLAN, LAN and Audio worked from base install. The only Linux distribution I've run that has managed to integrate the 4GB and 16Gb SSDs into one single volume. A little more resource hungry than most distributions and so suffers from longer boot times.

EeeBuntu NBR 2.0 - A good distribution specifically for EeePCs. Uses a custom interface designed specifically to suit netbooks and is based on Ubuntu. If you aren't worried about haveing a 'classic' style desktop then this is well worth checking out, and a classic desktop version is also available.

EasyPeasy - Designed specifically for the EeePC and has a full set of driver for the hardware as part of the base installation. Based on Ubuntu and using the same custom netbook interface as EeeBuntu NBR.

If there is another distribution that has good support for EeePC or Netbook platforms then please post it here ...

Jolicloud - one to watch

Jolicloud is a new, linux base netbook operating system that is being hyped at the moment aso one of the next significant OSs to be released with the netbook platform in mind.

Wired discuss Jolicloud in their blog at some length here "Netbooks Offer a Chance to Challenge Windows' Long Reign" and provide a screenshot of what looks to be a nice tidy interface.

Jolicloud can also be found on twitter.

I'm looking to review this either as soon as I can get access to a beta version, or when the final release arrives.

Windows XP on Netbooks ... Just say 'no'!

Even I have had a breif go with Windows XP on a netbook. But it's just wrong. The whole point of a netbook was to be small, cheap, robust, portable ... not something that is inherrent with Windows XP.

This article http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/microsoft-boasts-that-96-of-netbooks-now-run-windows/ explains how Microsoft is feeling pleased with themselves about their market saturation. If the numbers are true, then it's a pity. The linux community offers a belief in it's own product and a clarity of vision that has long been missing from Microsoft.

So the question is: why have XP on all these netbooks? Because of one simple fact: Windows XP make things easy. There are no hurdles to overcome, no difficulties in achieving simple or complex tasks. Downloaded software just installs and works. The drivers for the hardware always exist.

That is the one thing that the Linux community needs to learn from Microsoft - make it easy. I shouldn't have to do *anything* from the command line to make something work.

Fedora Linux 10 - First impressions

On Friday (3 days ago) I installed Fedora 10 Linux onto my EeePC 900.

The install was very easy (done from the Live CD, via USB DVD-ROM drive) and seems to support all the EeePC hardware out to the box (function keys, wlan, audio, trackpad). I don't know about the in-built camera yet as I haven't tested it.

The first things I noticed (after the slightly longer boot time than I'm used to (75 seconds to get to login prompt, +25 seconds to get logged in) was that the Fedora default disk build has done something very clever with it's disk partitioning system and has built a single 18.9GB volume out of my 4GB + 16GB solid state disks. This is the first time I have seen something like this (although I heard about it a couple of months ago). The cool thing is, it just works.

So far, Fedora is well behaved and works responsively, is s little slow to boot. As I get software installed on it I'll post further experiences. I'm aiming for the standard Open Office, Inkscape, Gimp (which was already included), Blender, Skype in addition to Firefox 3, Thunderbird and Remote Desktop. I'll also be seeing of I can find a way to get the '3' network 3G dongle that I have working on Fedora.

Looks good so far, I'll let you know about the rest ....

EeeBuntu NBR Mini-Review

I've been running EeeBuntu NBR (Netbook remix) for just over a week now and I'm struck by two things - first, how easy it is to use, and how well the innovative netbook interface works, and second, how much of a near-miss experience this has been for me.

I'm judging how well this works against other Linux distributions I have installed onto the same EeePC - OpenSuse and Mandriva being to key ones, as well as the user experience from using an operating system (OS) like MS Windows XP.

The install itself is as easy as can be - you answer a few questions about where and who you are, accept the suggested disk partitioning scheme (remember to backup any files before you do this - your disk will get formatted as part of the process) and everything goes ahead as planned.

The OS installs with no drama at all.

Once you have completed the install and logged in there is a configuration tool in the system menu that applies updates and fixes to ensure that all the right setup is done and that your EeePC works correctly. It takes only a minute or so and is completely automated.

The first problem I noted was when I tried to use my 4GB SD card in the EeePCs inbuilt reader - which didn't work. It seems that (on this install, on this hardware - a stock ASUS EeePC 900) that the OS is not configured to mount new devices automatically. Now, for those of us that are familiar with Linux, it's not too much of a problem to sort that out, but that is also not entirely the point.

The EeeBuntu NBR is designed specifically for people with netbooks who want a better OS, with a better user experience. The problem is, from what I've seen I'm not convinced that this would work without the user needing to sort a few things out by hand. If we think about MS Windows - you just plug in the device and it works. With the EeeBuntu NBR, that's not the case, and I don't think the target audience for that OS would necessarily know what to do to fix it or where to look to find out how.

Day-to-day the OS is responsive and works quickly. Boot times including login of about 60 seconds with applications starting fast and running well.

The other thing that struck me is that the pre-configured repositories (the online libraries of software available for installation) are rather limited - for example GIMP which is one of the most famous of open source graphics packages and is usually available along with Open Office and some other key applications, isn't - was rather surprised that it wasn't in the standard build.

Despite these few (minor) points, I'm struck by how good an OS this is and how well it works.

Mandriva 2009 1 and OpenSuse 11.1 Linux on EeePC 900

Posts reblogged from http://paleheretic.blogspot.com


Mandriva Linux on EeePC 900

Mandriva Linux and my Asus EeePC 900 - A follow-up review

OpenSuse 11.1 on EeePC 900 - How-to and mini-review